John EVELYN, 1620-1706
(text from the 1st edition, 1883)
John Evelyn, the representative of the more estimable part of the higher middle life of his time, who has so eloquently set forth the praises of the vegetable diet, also claims with Ray [John Ray the botanist] the honour of having first excited, amongst the opulent classes of his countrymen, a rational taste for botanical knowledge. Especially meritorious and truly patriotic was his appeal to the owners of land, by growing trees to provide the country with useful as well as ornamental timber for the benefit of posterity. He was one of the first to treat gardening and planting in a scientific manner; and his own cultivation of exotic and other valuable plants was a most useful example too tardily followed by ignorant or selfish landlords of those and succeeding times. It would have been well indeed for the mass of the people of these islands, had the owners of landed property cared to develop the teaching of Evelyn by stocking the country with various fruit trees, and so supplied at once an easy and wholesome food.
O fortunatos nimium, sua si bona norint, Agricolas! . . Fundit humo facilem victum justissima Tellus. (1)
The family of Evelyn was settled at Wooton, in Surrey. During the struggle between the Parliament and the Court he went abroad, and travelled for some years in France and in Italy, where he seems to have employed his leisure in a more refined and useful way than is the wont of most travelling countrymen. He returned home in 1651. At the foundation of the Royal Society, some ten years later, Evelyn became one of its earliest Fellows. His first work was published in 1664, Sylva; or a Discourse of Forest Trees and the Propagation of Timber. Its immediate cause was the application of the Naval Commissioners to the Royal Society for advice in view of the growing scarcity of timber, especially of oak, in England. A large quantity of the more valuable wood now existing is the practical outcome of his timely publication.
In 1675, appeared his Terra: a Discourse of the Earth Relating to the Culture and the Improvement of it, to Vegetation and the Propagation of Plants. The book by which he is most popularly known is his Diary and Correspondence, one of the most interesting productions of the kind. Besides its value as giving an insight into the manner of life in the fashionable society of the greater part of the seventeenth century, it is of importance as an independent chronicle of the public events of the day. The work which has most interest and value for us is his Acetaria (Salads, or Herbs eaten with vinegar), in which the author professes his faith in the truth and excellence of the vegetarian diet. Unfortunately, according to the usual perversity of literary enterprise, it is one of those few books which, representing some profounder truth, are nevertheless the most neglected by those who undertake to supply the mental and moral needs of the reading public.
Evelyn held many high posts under the varying Governments of the day; and being, by tradition and connexion, attached to the monarchical party, he attracted (contrary to general experience) the grateful recognition of the restored dynasty.
Having adduced other arguments for abstinence from flesh, Evelyn continues :-
"And now, after all we have advanced in favour of the herbaceous diet,
there still emerges another inquiry, viz., whether the use of crude
herbs and plants is so wholesome as is alleged?
What opinion the prince of physicians had of them, we shall see
hereafter; as also what the sacred records of olden times seem to infer,
before there were any flesh-shambles in the world; together with the
reports of such as are often conversant among many nations and people,
who to this day, living on herbs and roots, arrive to an incredible
age, in constant health and vigour: which, whether attributable to the
air and climate, custom, constitution, &c. should be inquired
Cardan - the pseudo-savant of the sixteenth century - had written, it seems, in favour of flesh-meat. Evelyn informs us that :-
"This, [the alleged superiority of flesh] his learned antagonist
utterly denies. Whole nations - flesh devourers, such as the farthest
northern - become heavy, dull, inactive, and much more stupid than
the southern; and such as feed more on plants, are more acute, subtle,
and of deeper penetration. Witness the Chaldeans, Assyrians,
Egyptians, &c. And he further argues from the short lives of most
carnivorous animals, compared with grass feeders, and the ruminating
kind; as the Hart, Camel, and the longævous Elephant, and other
feeders on roots and vegetables.
"As soon as old Parr came to change his simple
homely diet to that of the Court and Arundel House, he quickly sank
and drooped away: For, as we have shewn, the stomach easily concocts
plain and familiar food, but finds it a hard and difficult task, to
vanquish and overcome meats of different substances. Whence we so
often see temperate and abstemious persons of a collegiate diet [of a distinct age, we must suppose], very
healthy; husbandsmen and laborious people more robust and longer lived
than others of an uncertain extravagant habit.
He appeals to the biblical reverence of his readers, and tells them :-
"Certain it is, Almighty God ordaining herbs and fruit for the
food of man, speaks not a word concerning flesh for two thousand
years; and when after, by the Mosaic Constitution, there were
distinctions and prohibitions about the legal uncleanness of animals,
plants, of what kind soever, were left free and indifferent for everyone to choose what best he liked. And what if it was held undecent and
unbecoming the excellency of man's nature, before sin entered, and grew
enormously wicked, that any creature should be put to death and pain for
him who had such infinite store of the most delicious and nourishing
fruit to delight, and the tree of life to sustain him? Doubtless there
was no need of it. Infants sought the mother's nipple as soon as born;
and when grown, and able to feed themselves, ran naturally to fruit, and
still will choose to eat it rather than flesh and certainly might so
persist to do, did not Custom prevail, even against the very dictates of
And now to recapitulate what other prerogatives the hortulan provision
has been celebrated for, besides its antiquity, health and longevity
of the antediluvians - viz., that temperance, frugality, leisure, ease, and
innumerable other virtues and advantages, which accompany it, are no
less attributable to it. Let us hear our excellent botanist Mr.
He then quotes the profession of faith of the father of English botany and zoology; and goes on eloquently to expiate on the varied pleasures of a non-flesh and fruit diet :-
"To this might we add that transporting consideration, becoming both our
veneration and admiration of the infinitely wise and glorious author of
nature, who has given to plants such astonishing properties; such
fiery heat in some to warm and cherish, such coolness in others to
temper and refresh, such pinguid juice to nourish and feed the body,
such quickening acids to compel the appetite, and grateful vehicles to
court the obedience of the palate, such vigour to renew and support our
natural strength, such ravishing flavour and perfumes to recreate and
delight us; in short, such spirituous and active force to animate and
revive every faculty and part, to all the kinds of human, and, I had
almost said heavenly capacity.
"What shall we add more? Our Gardens
present us with them all; and whilst the Shambles are covered with
gore and stench, our Sallets escape the Insults of the summer-fly,
purify and warm the blood against winter rage. Nor wants there
variety in more abundance, than any of the former ages could shew."
Evelyn produces an imposing array of the "Old Fathers" :-
In short, so very many, especially of the
Christian profession, advocate it [the bloodless food] that some, even of the ancient fathers
themselves, have almost thought that the permission of eating flesh to
Noah and his sons, was granted them no otherwise than repudiation of
wives was to the Jews, namely, for the hardness of their hearts, and
to satisfy a murmuring generation."
He is "persuaded that more blood has been shed between Christians" through addiction to sanguinary food than by any other cause :-
Not that I impute it
only to our eating blood; but I sometimes wonder how it happened that
so strict, so solemn and famous a sanction_ not upon a ceremonial
account; but (as some affirm) a moral and perpetual one for which there seem
to be fairer proofs than for most other controversies agitated among
Christians - should be so generally forgotten, and give place to so
many other impertinent disputes and cavels about other superstitious
fopperies, which frequently end in blood and cutting of throats.